Toyota Dealers Would Rather Sell Hybrids Than EVs

Electric cars are having a hard time reaching massive acceptance among the car-buying public, and it isn’t just consumers who are concerned. A new study shows that Toyota’s own dealers prefer selling hybrid models like the Prius to pure electric vehicles. Just one more roadblock to EV acceptance.

The study, done by AutoRetailNet, highlights one of the main issues in EV adoption; lining up buyers and sellers. Many car dealers hardly know their own vehicles, and electric vehicles really seem to throw them for a loop. Most dealerships involved in the study would rather continue selling popular hybrid cars like the Toyota Prius. Perhaps Toyota was right to kill its all-electric Scion iQ?

It certainly looks that way, as the study finds that 85% of dealerships agree with Toyota’s decision to shelf sales of the Scion iQ EV. Only 5% of dealers believe that EVs will be their best-selling models in the next five years, though 61% of the dealers believe an all-electric car will show up on their lots some time in the future.

That said, if the dealers aren’t behind a product, how can they be expected to sell it to customers? Many Nissan dealerships appeared woefully unprepared for the rollout of the all-electric Leaf, as were many Chevy dealerships in regards to the Volt plug-in hybrid. If you have a salesperson trying to get you to buy a $30,000+ vehicle that they don’t seem to have any knowledge or passion about…it could be hard to make a sale. With Toyota’s first all-electric vehicle, the Rav4 EV, costing around $50,000, sales will be even more difficult.

The dealers did offer some interesting insights though, as 70% of them thought hybrids would continue to dominate sales. Just 10% believed plug-in hybrids would become major sellers in the next five years, but 15% of those surveyed put faith in fuel-cell vehicles.

Toyota has a fuel-cell vehicle due out in 2015, and it should sell in the $50,000 range. Will Toyota dealers prove more accepting of hydrogen fuel cells than they are of electric vehicles? Time will tell…for now though, EVs seem to be getting shuffled to the back of the bus.

Read original post here:

Toyota to Introduce 21 New Hybrid Models Over the Next Three Years

Tokyo: Toyota Motor Corp today said it will introduce 21 new hybrid car models in the global market by the end of 2015, aiming to sell at least 1 million units of such gasoline-electric hybrids a year globally from 2013 to 2015.

Toyota also said it will offer from December the new compact electric vehicle “eQ” to local governments and selected users in Japan and the United States.

The new vehicle has the world’s most efficient electric power consumption rate, the Japanese automaker added.

Toyota to introduce 21 new hybrid models by end of 2015

In 2012, global sales of Toyota’s hybrid cars are expected to exceed 1 million units, the automaker said.

U.S. completes 54.5 mpg fuel-economy mandate for light vehicles

 

WASHINGTON (Bloomberg) — President Barack Obama released a final version of a rule forcing automakers to more than double average fuel economy by 2025 that includes changes benefiting Honda Motor Co. and other makers of alternative-fuel vehicles.

“By the middle of the next decade, our cars will get nearly 55 miles per gallon, almost double what they get today,” Obama said today in an e-mailed statement. “It’ll strengthen our nation’s energy security, it’s good for middle class families and it will help create an economy built to last.”

Corporate average fuel economy, or CAFE, rules released today and that took effect earlier this year are supposed to reduce U.S. oil consumption by 12 billion barrels and lead to fuel savings of more than $8,000 by 2025 over the life of a vehicle, the White House said.

Boosting average fuel economy is part of Obama’s plan to reduce oil imports and use. Promoting purchases of more fuel-efficient vehicles can help reduce the use of fossil fuels.

The Environmental Protection Agency and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration released the proposed rule for model years 2017 to 2025 in November after reaching an agreement with automakers on the outline in July 2011. Auto executives from companies including General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co., Chrysler Group LLC and Hyundai Motor Co. stood with Obama at the Washington Convention Center to tout the agreement, which was the basis for the final rule.

The proposed rule granted incentives to plug-in electric and plug-in electric-hybrid vehicles, with the final rule adding natural-gas-powered cars to that list. Honda sells vehicles powered by natural gas.

Price tag: $192 billion

The 2025 rule and one that took effect this year and applies through 2016 could together cost as much as $192 billion, according to administration estimates. The administration has said the 2017-2025 rule would save as much as $515 billion in fuel spending as they add an average of $2,000 to the price of each new passenger vehicle by 2025.

The proposed rule required automakers to improve car fuel economy by an average of 5 percent annually and trucks’ by 3.5 percent in most years.

Obama had delayed release of the final version from a self-imposed Aug. 15 deadline. The proposed rule was criticized by U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and foreign automakers as a sweetheart deal for U.S. automakers, especially GM and Chrysler Group LLC, which received government bailouts.

German automakers Daimler AG and Volkswagen AG didn’t sign agreements, saying the plan gave an advantage to light trucks, primarily made by U.S. automakers. Honda, which signed the agreement, made similar assertions in e-mails that Issa’s committee released earlier this month.

Consumers have been slower to embrace electric vehicles than automakers had hoped for, in spite of a $7,500 U.S. tax credit for buyers. Customers bought fewer GM Chevrolet Volts and Nissan Motor Co. Leafs than the automakers produced in 2011, the first year of U.S. sales of plug-in electric vehicles made by mass-market manufacturers.

Electrics, hybrids

Selling more hybrid and plug-in electric vehicles would help automakers meet CAFE targets. Toyota Motor Corp.’s Prius, the best-selling hybrid vehicle, sold 136,463 cars last year, accounting for 1.1 percent of light-vehicle sales in the U.S., according to the Bloomberg Government analysis.

Luxury automakers including Daimler and BMW will have a harder time complying with the rule than will full-line manufacturers that can balance gas guzzlers with fuel sippers, the analysis found.

Proponents of increasing fuel economy have complained about a provision that a Public Citizen official labeled “wiggle room” because it allows for a review of the rule in 2018 and adjustment of the mandate.

“We won’t kid ourselves about the automakers’ plans for compliance,” Tyson Slocum, director of the consumer-advocacy group’s energy program, said in an Aug. 23 statement. “We can be sure the industry will attempt to make a case that it is too expensive to meet the federal goal of 54.5 mpg. And you can be just as sure that we will be there, working to hold them to it.”

Jobs pledged

The Natural Resources Defense Council and BlueGreen Alliance say the rule could create as many as 570,000 jobs by boosting demand for new technologies.

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said on the conference call that the rule “may lead to new jobs,” declining to give an estimate.

The new standards give automakers flexibility in how to meet them and result in different improvement targets among automakers, a Bloomberg Government study found. While they will require fuel-economy increases, because of the way the rule is structured and credits it offers automakers, car buyers won’t see fuel-economy gains of that scope on window stickers.

The fuel component of the rule will require an average of 49.6 mpg for automakers’ fleets by 2025, while the corresponding carbon dioxide-emissions requirement will yield 54.5 mpg, according to Bloomberg Government.

Regulators can levy fines on automakers who don’t meet the requirements, which are based on vehicles that consumers buy rather than the fleet produced by the manufacturers.

Reactions to the new standards
The long-awaited federal fuel efficiency standards were released today. Here are some official reactions to the 54.5 mpg fleet average for U.S vehicles by 2025.

Volkswagen Group of America:
“Volkswagen Group of America (VW) continues to support a single national standard for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions regulation for 2017-25. However, VW did not endorse the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in part because it believed the compliance burdens were not equitably shared across the industry. Following an initial review, the Final Rule reflects the NPRM by imposing very high GHG reductions on passenger cars, and much lower reductions on light trucks. VW continues to believe that this places an unfair burden on manufacturers focused primarily on passenger cars — the segment of the fleet already delivering to consumers the most fuel efficient, low CO2 emitting vehicles — and fails to achieve an equitable burden across the full range of light-duty vehicles. In addition, the Final Rule grants valuable compliance credits to certain fuel-saving technologies while failing to equitably recognize the environmental benefits of others.”

Ford and Chrysler responded through the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers:
“The Auto Alliance has called for a single, national program because conflicting requirements from several regulatory bodies raise costs, ultimately taking money out of consumers’ pockets and hurting sales. We all want to get more fuel-efficient autos on our roads, and a single, national program with a strong midterm review helps us get closer to that shared goal.”

Toyota Motor Corp.:
“As we have said all along, the standards pose a formidable challenge for our engineers and product planners. But our overriding objective has been to avoid state-by-state regulation of fuel economy and greenhouse gas regulations. The agreement reached last year, and the regulations finalized today, are a step in the right direction toward this goal.”

General Motors Co.:
“While the requirements are aggressive, we intend to pursue them vigorously by utilizing our strong history of innovation and technology development. As the rule also provides, however, further assessments and reviews will be undertaken to see if the underlying assumptions used to set the fuel economy and greenhouse gas requirements are achievable and realistic in the years well into the future.”

Adam Lee, chairman of Lee Auto Malls of Maine:
“As a third-generation auto dealer, I can say with absolute confidence that my customers want cars, trucks and SUVs that go farther on a tank of gas. I support the 54.5 mpg standard because it will keep American automakers competitive in the world market, it will keep my customers happy, and it will help me to sell even more cars. Automakers, consumers and consumer experts, national security leaders and environmentalists all back the standards because they will save families money, cut America’s oil dependence, drive greater innovation in the auto industry, and improve our environment.”

UAW President Bob King:
“These new standards will help propel the auto industry forward by giving American families long-term relief from volatile fuel prices. Lowering the total cost of driving will make automobiles more affordable and expand the market for new vehicles. The standards will also provide certainty for manufacturers in planning their investments and creating jobs in the auto industry as they add more fuel-saving technology to their vehicles. Bringing this additional content to market requires more engineers and more factory workers, expanding employment in the industry.”

Frances Beinecke, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council:
“Everybody is a winner today. Motorists win because they will have much more fuel-efficient cars to drive, thus saving thousands of dollars at the gas pump every year. The auto industry — and its workers — win because these standards will spur the creation of thousands of new jobs as well as state-of-the-art vehicles that go nearly twice as far on the same gallon of gasoline.”

Michelle Robinson, director of the clean vehicles program for the Union of Concerned Scientists:
“This is truly a watershed moment. Twenty years from now we’ll be looking back on this as the day we chose innovation over stagnation. These standards will protect consumers from high gas prices, curb global warming pollution, cut our oil use, and create new jobs in the American auto industry and around the nation.”

U.S. Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich.:
“Of critical importance in the standard is the mid-term review, which will allow all parties to take a step back and reevaluate, making necessary adjustments. In addition, the flexibilities built into the program are of the utmost importance. Finally, and most importantly, this is one national standard. A patchwork of different standards would have been a disaster for the economy.”

Mark Cooper, director of research, Consumer Federation of America:
“This is not only a big win for consumers, it is vital to the U.S. auto industry and the single most important thing we can do to end America’s addiction to oil – something President George W. Bush called “a serious problem” – and to improve our national energy security. The many benefits of this policy are so clear that is has garnered widespread support from the public, automakers, auto workers, national security experts, public health advocates and environmentalists.”

Erika Nielsen, director of marketing at BorgWarner Inc.:
“Automakers are looking for solutions that provide better fuel economy and reduce emissions while maintaining performance. That means new opportunities for our company, because our turbochargers, variable cam timing, dual clutch transmission modules and other powertrain technologies can help provide cleaner vehicles while maintaining or improving performance.”

Jake Fisher, director of auto testing for Consumer Reports magazine:
“Gasoline prices and fuel economy are clearly on consumers’ minds when they go to buy a new vehicle. Our surveys show that consumers are interested in finding new ways to achieve that, like turning to hybrids and other alternatively fueled vehicles. The new fuel-efficiency standard will help provide consumers with a fleet of vehicles that will reduce the bill at the gas station.”

– Compiled by Vince Bond and Philip Nussel

Spy Photos: 2015 Toyota Hydrogen Sedan

Toyota Hydrogen Sedan Picture
What could go wrong with a truck full of compressed hydrogen in Death Valley? | August 9, 2012 | KGP Photography

 

Toyota Hydrogen Sedan Picture
With the exception of the blanked-out grille, this could be any HS 250h.
| August 09, 2012 | KGP Photography

 

Toyota Hydrogen Sedan Picture
Toyota’s plans call for a hydrogen-powered sedan in 2015.
| August 9, 2012 | KGP Photography

 

 

 

Toyota plans to sell fuel cell car by 2015

 

BY Alisa Priddle

DETROIT FREE PRESS BUSINESS WRITER

Toyota plans to sell a fuel cell vehicle in 2015, which would make it the clear leader in a technology most other automakers see as being about 10 years from market-ready.

Toyota is sticking to its timetable of selling a fuel cell sedan in three years, said Justin Ward, advanced powertrain program manager at the Toyota Technical Center in Ann Arbor.

Volume could be substantial, but distribution will likely be centered in California – which plans to have 68 hydrogen fueling stations by the end of 2015, with New York and Connecticut also are promising to build a stronger hydrogen infrastructure, Ward said at the Center for Automotive Research Management Briefing Seminars here. Michigan has not made a similar commitment.

Ward said the fuel cell car will be available for both retail and commercial sale.

“Volume will be what the infrastructure can hold,” Ward said, adding that the vehicle will have a range similar to that of a conventional gasoline engine-powered vehicle.

The strategy appears similar to the path Toyota took on hybrids when it put the Prius on the road in 1997. Competitors smirked that Toyota was selling the hybrids at a loss, but sales kept growing.

Toyota went on to become a hybrid leader and continues its success today with four models under the Prius brand.

Executives from Ford, General Motors, Chrysler and Volkswagen see fuel cell vehicles as being further out and most have not said when they will have vehicles on the market.

“We don’t see it as early as Toyota does,” said Oliver Schmidt, general manager of engineering with the VW Group. “We see it in the 2020 timeframe.”

VW has a test fleet of fuel cell prototype vehicles on the road in the U.S., Europe and China, but the learning curve is still steep.

Joe Bakaj, Ford vice president of powertrain engineering, said, “the question is when fuel cell vehicles become affordable to customers,” specifically when the fuel cell stack competes with the battery pack on cost.

“Within 10 years I think they will be as affordable as full battery vehicles and the fuel cell will have a big advantage in range,” Bakaj said. “We think it will happen in the next 10 years.”

GM also has a long range view.

“The key is creating the infrastructure,” said Gary Smyth, executive director working on global research and development for GM.

Smyth sees little commitment in the U.S. to the necessary infrastructure by 2015 while countries like Germany have about 100 hydrogen stations.

“Korea and Japan are more aggressive in their commitment to infrastructure than the U.S.,” Smyth said, calling for American automakers to work with government to address the need.

2012 Toyota RAV4 EV: First Drive Of Tesla-Powered Crossover

2012 Toyota RAV4 EV, Newport Beach, California, July 2012

 

2012 Toyota RAV4 EV, Newport Beach, California, July 20122012 Toyota RAV4 EV, Newport Beach, California, July 2012

 

 

If the ideal electric car has a real-world range of 100 miles or more and the practical utility that American families buy crossovers for, the future may be arriving this year.

The 2012 Toyota RAV4 EV has every bit of space that the gasoline versions do. Its Tesla-engineered battery pack and electric motor give it better performance than the RAV4′s most powerful V-6 version, plus a real-world range of 100 or more miles (depending on how you use the climate control).

It’s too bad that the RAV4 EV will only be sold in California as a “compliance car,” in a limited run of just 2,600 over the next three model years.

In other words, even if you want one–and have the price of $49,800–you may not be able to buy one.

As electric-car advocates may remember, this is actually the second RAV4 EV. The first one was built a decade ago to comply with earlier California zero-emission vehicle mandates that were subsequently changed, so Toyota stopped building them.

There are still almost 500 of the 2002 Toyota RAV4 EVs running around California–we drove one a couple of years ago–and their owners have been waiting eagerly for the new 2012 model.

Developed in record time, with a deal between Toyota and Tesla announced in May 2010 by respective CEOs Akio Toyoda and Elon Musk, the 2012 RAV4 EV will go on sale later this year in select California markets.

Tesla battery and motor

Tesla Motors [NSDQ:TSLA] engineered the lithium-ion battery pack, which has 41.8 kilowatt-hours of usable capacity and sits below the floorpan.

Ground clearance is consequently reduced by a couple of inches, but the RAV4′s cargo space of 36.4 cubic feet is untouched–as is the rear-seat foot room.

2012 Toyota RAV4 EV, Newport Beach, California, July 20122012 Toyota RAV4 EV, Newport Beach, California, July 2012

Tesla also provided the AC induction motor that powers the front wheels, which is the same unit used in the 2012 Tesla Model S electric sport sedan, but with a lower peak output of 115 kilowatts (limited not by the motor itself but by the pack power).

The drive motor, power electronics, and onboard battery charger are located under the hood where the engine and transmission used to sit.

Despite the loss of those items, the RAV4 EV is roughly 470 pounds heavier than a front-wheel drive RAV4 Limited with the V-6 engine, rising to roughly 4,030 pounds.

But it’s the power that really impresses when you drive the RAV4 EV, which more or less uses the powertrain and battery capacity of the lowest-spec Tesla Model S with a 40-kWh battery pack.

Toyota quotes less than 7 seconds from 0 to 60 mph in Sport mode and, more importantly–where it really counts in real-world usage–just 2.5 seconds to go from 30 to 50 mph. That’s notably faster than the best V-6 version.

Top speed is limited to 85 mph in Normal mode, and 100 mph in Sport mode.

User control: lots

As in Tesla vehicles, there are a number of user-controllable settings. There are normal and Sport drive modes, for instance, the latter boosting your acceleration even if you keep your foot steady when you push the Sport button while underway.

2012 Toyota RAV4 EV, Newport Beach, California, July 20122012 Toyota RAV4 EV, Newport Beach, California, July 2012

Then there are three climate settings: Eco-High, Eco-Low, and Normal. The Normal setting essentially replicates the maximum-blast behavior of a gasoline car’s cooling and heating system–and it chews through range at a major rate.

Eco-Low moderates that, and Eco-High is the least powerful climate setting, providing the most range.

Toyota claimed that Eco-Low is enough to keep front-seat passengers comfortable, if not either chilly or toasty, on cold and hot days respectively.

We were skeptical, but in fact in California coastal weather up to the low 80s, that proved entirely true with the fan on a lower setting.

We didn’t have any chance to test the car in chilly Northeastern winter weather–but then, it won’t be sold there, so it’s somewhat academic.

From 93 to 112 miles of range

Perhaps the most significant aspect of the 2012 RAV4 EV, though, is its real-world range–courtesy of the relatively huge usable 42 kWh of the battery pack.

(By comparison, the 2012 Nissan Leaf has a maximum usable pack capacity of 20.4 kilowatt-hours, or half that number.)

In an afternoon of driving two different electric RAV4s, we concluded two things.

2012 Toyota RAV4 EV, Newport Beach, California, July 20122012 Toyota RAV4 EV, Newport Beach, California, July 2012

First, it’s easy to get 100 to 115 miles of range no matter how you drive the car, in local stop-and-go or at legal freeway speeds and then some (given the general traffic flow in Southern California).

Second, the Tesla/Toyota range estimator on the RAV4 EV is remarkably accurate, with the change to projected range usually no more than 1 mile different than the actual mileage covered.

We didn’t run any of our test cars down near 0 range, but Toyota assured us that there’s a small margin even after the battery is shown as totally depleted.

Range of 158 miles, RLY?

Toyota estimates that in Normal charging mode–which doesn’t charge the battery pack to 100 percent–the RAV4 EV has a range of 93 miles.

If the owner needs more range and sets the electric RAV4 to “Extended Range” charging mode, that rises almost 20 percent, to 112 miles.

Despite lengthy conversations with the EPA, though, Toyota was not able to convince the agency to let it list two separate ranges–so it expects the EPA-rated range to come in around 98 miles.

Just for reference, with a fully charged pack and the ventilation turned completely off in one of our test vehicles, the range estimator said we had 158 miles. That’s worth opening some windows for.

The number fell to 92 when we touched the switch for Normal ventilation, rose to 111 on Eco-Low, and then 118 on Eco-High–which was where we left it.

10-kW charging

Unlike lesser battery electric cars whose onboard chargers are limited to 3.3 kilowatts (Nissan Leaf) or 6.6 kilowatts (Ford Focus Electric, Coda Sedan), the Tesla-designed charger in the RAV4 EV can charge at up to 10 kilowatts.

Toyota Prius Escapes Niche to Surge Into Global Top Three

Toyota Motor Corp. (7203)’s Prius, a niche oddity when it went on sale 15 years ago, jumped to the world’s third best-selling car line in the first quarter as U.S. demand and incentives in Japan turned the hybrid into a mainstream hit.

 

Prius sales more than doubled as Toyota extended the name to a four-model “family” of vehicles at the same time that rebates and tax breaks in Japan are saving buyers the equivalent of $2,500 or more. In the quarter, sales soared to 247,230, trailing only Toyota’s Corolla, at 300,800, and Ford Motor Co. (F)’s 277,000 Focus sales.

The Prius surge, after two years of recalls and production disruptions, propelled the Toyota City, Japan-based company back into the global sales lead for the first three months of the year. The hybrid line also gives the Toyota brand three of the top 10 models in the U.S. so far this year, including its midsize Camry.

“It proves Prius wasn’t a fluke, that there’s a long-term market for hybrids,” said Eric Noble, president of the Car Lab, an automotive consultancy in Orange, California.

In the aftermath of last year’s earthquake and tsunami that cut parts and auto production for Japanese carmakers, the government in December began encouraging purchases of fuel- efficient autos to reverse sagging domestic deliveries.

Rebates of as much as 100,000 yen ($1,258) are available from a 300 billion yen fund for qualified cars, including the Prius hatchback, wagon, plug-in and Aqua subcompact, sold in the U.S. and elsewhere as the Prius c. Tax savings further reduce the purchase price by another 100,000 yen or more. The average price for a Prius in Japan is about 2.5 million yen and around $25,000 in the U.S.

Hot Little Car

Aqua has become the car of the moment in Japan, helping more than triple Prius family sales in the country to 175,080 in the first quarter, from 52,507 last year. While funds for the rebates may run out in July if the government doesn’t extend them, the tax reductions continue through 2015.

“It was good that introduction of Aqua and the start of government subsidies happened almost at the same time,” said Koichi Sugimoto, senior analyst at BNP Paribas in Tokyo, who recommends that investors hold Toyota shares. He added that there’s more to the success than the government incentives. “Toyota is introducing good vehicles and assuming it will maintain a certain volume even after the subsidies end,” he said.

The Prius line topped other high-volume car models including Hyundai Motor Co. (005380)’s Elantra, Volkswagen AG’s Golf, Ford’s Fiesta, General Motor Co.’s Cruze and Honda Motor Co.’s Civic, according to the companies.

Global Lead

Toyota ranked as the world’s largest automaker by sales from 2008 to 2010, before the natural disasters pared its global production and deliveries.

Sales of Toyota, Lexus, Scion, Hino and Daihatsu vehicles grew 18 percent to 2.49 million in the quarter, Toyota said in a U.S. regulatory filing this month. That put it ahead of Detroit- based GM (GM)’s 2.28 million and VW (VOW)’s 2.16 million, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Chief Executive Officer Akio Toyoda has said the company founded by his grandfather is “turning the corner” after a couple of difficult years. The company endured record recalls in 2010 in the U.S., its biggest single market, for floor-mat and gas-pedal flaws that caused unintended acceleration.

‘Clearly Coming Back’

“You are seeing a company that is clearly coming back,” said Efraim Levy, equity analyst with Standard & Poor’s Capital IQ in New York, who rates Toyota’s American depositary receipts a hold. “For Prius to sell in that kind of volume, something that’s been a niche product, it’s an achievement.”

Since the start of Prius sales in Japan in 1997, Toyota has sold 4 million hybrid-electric vehicles worldwide, including 1.5 million in the U.S., the company said May 22.

In the U.S., typically Toyota’s top market for Prius, sales jumped 42 percent in the first quarter, and 56 percent through April to a record 86,027. U.S. sales of the model since its 2000 introduction, including the new variations, total 1.18 million vehicles, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Global sales increased 125 percent.

Prius sets a standard of success for alternatively powered cars, including Nissan Motor Co. (7201)’s all-electric Leaf and GM’s Chevrolet Volt, which has a gas-burning generator on board to extend the range of the electric-drive car.

The sales pace for Prius isn’t likely to be matched soon by any other hybrid models, said John Wolkonowicz, an independent analyst in Boston who specializes in automotive history.

Defines The Segment

“It’s the phenomenon we saw with Chrysler and minivans: It brought out the first minivan and after all these years, Chrysler still is minivan sales leader,” he said. “Prius was the first hybrid on the block.”

The Prius line’s current global popularity provides marketing benefits, Wolkonowicz said.

“Being No. 1 is important for advertising purposes; it provides a comfort factor that, for Prius, can be significant,” he said. “It provides a ‘why buy?’ reason for customers who may be on the fence.”

The top-selling vehicle line in the U.S. for the past 30 years has been Ford’s F-Series pickup truck, which includes F-150, F-250 and other models. Toyota’s Camry has been the top- selling car in the U.S. for 10 years.

Toyota’s decision to give the car a distinctive wedge shape that some car enthusiasts dislike has also been a long-term benefit, Wolkonowicz said.

“Even grandmas who don’t know cars know what a Prius is,” he said.

Everybody’s Green Car

The appeal of Prius has as much to with how it’s now a de facto brand within Toyota, positioned as the top “green” choice, as the car’s actual fuel economy, Noble said.

“Prius is a Prius first and a Toyota second,” he said. “The fact it’s doing well this year is a reflection of the strength of the model line and the Prius brand.”

While the current rate suggests U.S. drivers may want to buy 250,000 or more Prius models in 2012, the region may not get more than its planned 220,000 units.

“I’ve ordered additional production,” Bob Carter, Toyota’s group vice president of U.S. sales, said in a May 7 interview. “I’m confident we’ll get additional production, but globally we’re seeing high demand, particularly in Japan.”

Gasoline prices in the U.S. averaged $3.68 a gallon on May 22, down 6.6 percent from $3.94 on April 5. A continued price decline doesn’t favor hybrid sales, said Wolkonowicz.

“You’re going to see hybrid sales drop again in U.S. as gas prices fall,” he said. “Hybrid sales won’t truly take off in the U.S. until we get to $5 gas and it stays.”

Toyota’s American depositary receipts rose 0.3 percent to $77.05 at the close in New York. They’ve risen 17 percent this year.

Stupid? Toyota’s 400 hp super Supra hybrid car

 

The original FT-HS hybrid concept at NAIAS in 2007

 

Do Supra fans want a $60,000, 400-hp hybrid?

by electriccarblogging

Since at least 2007, Toyota has been kicking around the idea of a sporty hybrid, but just how sporty has been a bit unclear. Would the new hybrid follow more in the lines of the Honda CR-Z hybrid that offers a sporty look and sportier drive than most hybrids, but isn’t really a sport’s car? Or would it be a real horsepower-loaded sports car?

In the last few years a Supra replacement has been the hot idea, and Toyota could be ready to offer a new Supra hybrid by 2015.

According to MotorTrend the all-wheel drive, 400-hp Supra hybrid has not been officially approved, and it probably won’t be confirmed until the economy improves a bit more. One way or another, however, a sporty hybrid from Toyota does seem inevitable.

If the Supra hybrid gets the nod, I wonder about the market. Is there a market? Supra fans on MotorTrend don’t seem too happy with the idea of a hybrid powertrain, but I’m betting they might change their mind if Toyota can kick up the torque thanks to a burst of electric power, for instance. Still, it’s not going to be an easy sell.

In my opinion a Toyota sporty hybrid should follow the path of the CR-Z, but backed up with about twice as much horsepower — around 200 hp — instead of 4 times as much. Think of consumers that might like the idea of a Prius, but that want something with more power and, definitely, a more sporty look. It doesn’t have to have super car horsepower. If someone is going to buy a sporty hybrid, it’s not pure performance they want. It’s higher fuel economy in a sporty package that can offer an occasional burst of performance.

Nevertheless, I have to admit that I’d be interested to see if Toyota could use its hybrid technology to convince a consumer group like Supra fans, that are often driven by hybrid-hate, that hybrid cars are better. That might make the Supra hybrid worth the effort.

RAV4 EV Launched: $49,800 And 100 miles Range

 

Including an $810 destination charge, the sticker price will actually be $50,610. Tax incentives of $2,500 in California, and $7,500 federally will be available.

By Philippe Crowe        Published May 7, 2012

Details have been released today on the Rav4 EV. The all-electric SUV will come in one fully-equipped flavor, with a MSRP of $49,800.

This was revealed today by Toyota which showed the all-new Toyota RAV4 EV at the 26th annual Electric Vehicle Symposium in Los Angeles. The battery powered SUV has an expected driving range rating of approximately 100 miles and charging time of approximately six hours on a 240V/40A charger. According to Toyota, the RAV4 EV’s driving performance, dynamics and cargo capacity are equal to or exceed the gas powered RAV4 V6.

The RAV4 EV, to be built in Canada, will go on sale in late summer 2012 through select dealers, initially in four major California metropolitan markets including Sacramento, San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles/Orange County and San Diego. Sales volume is planned for approximately 2,600 units over the next three years. The battery warranty is 8 years or 100,000 miles.

 

 

The RAV4 EV combines a Tesla designed and produced battery and electric powertrain with Toyota’s most popular SUV model. The RAV4 EV’s battery pack is mounted low and to the center of the vehicle.

The front wheel drive RAV4 EV allows drivers to select from two distinctly different drive modes, Sport and Normal. In Sport mode, the vehicle reaches 0-60 mph in just 7.0 seconds and has a maximum speed of 100 mph. Normal mode achieves 0-60 mph in 8.6 seconds with a maximum speed of 85 mph. Maximum output from the electric powertrain is 154 horsepower (115 kilowatt) @ 2,800 rpm.

The front of the RAV4 EV has been modified to obtain a low 0.30 coefficient of drag. Compared with the gas powered RAV4, Toyota re-styled the front bumper, upper and lower grill, side mirrors, rear spoiler, and under body design to maximize air flow around the vehicle.

 

 

 

Inside, a six-way adjustable driver’s seat includes variable front seat heaters, which extends heater coverage to the occupant’s upper back. The split reclining rear seats with folding center arm rest fold flat for increased cargo space, with a total cargo capacity equivalent to the conventional RAV4 of 73 cubic feet. No interior space is lost in the vehicle due to EV components.

Toyota’s approved electric vehicle supplier equipment provider is Leviton, which offers multiple options for charging solutions. For the shortest charge time of approximately six hours, Leviton offers a custom 240-volt (Level 2), 40A, 9.6-kw output charging station. The vehicle comes equipped with a 120V (Level 1) emergency charging cable for instances when the recommended 240V (Level 2) charging is not available.

Toyota looking for high-volume Prius assembly in U.S. by 2015

 
Toyota Prius - front three-quarter view

 

By  Sebastian Blanco
Rumors that Toyota would some day build the Prius in the U.S. have bounced around for years, with a location in Mississippi often being cited as the most likely candidate. After that plan was officially scrapped in 2008, a new version of the same story returned in 2010 when a Toyota executive vice president said Mississippi Prius production could start up in 2016. Given the on-again, off-again history of the story, we weren’t surprised when not much was officially said about the matter in the last two years. That changed today.

Koei Saga, senior managing officer in charge of drivetrain R&D at Toyota, has informed Automotive News that Toyota is now thinking of making the Prius in the U.S. by 2015 and wants to get hybrid drivetrain components – motors, inverters, batteries (likely lithium-ion packs) – from North American suppliers. The base fourth-gen Prius will probably still use nickel-metal hydride batteries, but the batteries made in the U.S. might be li-ion.

A 2015 timetable means it is likely that America would make the fourth-gen Prius model, which is due around that time. The reason this story keeps coming back is because it makes sense to build the Prius in the States. Sales are strong here and expected to grow, so extra production somewhere will almost certainly be needed to meet demand. Plus, a strong yen means that Prius vehicles built in America would likely come at a lower cost to Toyota.

Toyota currently makes the Camry hybrid in the U.S. at its plant in Georgetown, KY. The question as to whether the U.S. Prius would be made there, at Toyota’s Mississippi plant, at the Tesla plant in Fremont, CA (formerly known as NUMMI) – where rumors about Toyota and the electric car automaker building electric cars like the RAV4 EVhave also floated around in the past – or somewhere else completely will need to be answered at another time.

See original post here: